• NSF NEON | Open Data to Understand our Ecosystems
  • Biorepository Data Portal

  • Home
  • Search
    • Sample search
    • Map search
    • Dynamic Species List
    • Taxonomic Explorer
  • Images
    • Image Browser
    • Image Search
  • Datasets
    • Research Datasets and Special Collections
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Invertebrates
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Plants
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Vertebrates
  • Sample Use
    • Sample Use Policy
    • Sample Request
    • Sample Archival Request
    • Data Usage Policy
  • Additional Information
    • Tutorials and Help
    • About NEON
    • NEON Data Portal
    • ASU Biocollections
    • About Symbiota
  • Getting Started
Login New Account Sitemap
Rhus microphylla Engelm.  

No occurrences found

Family: Anacardiaceae
littleleaf sumac
Rhus microphylla image
Robert Sivinski
  • VPAP
  • Field Guide
  • Resources
CANOTIA 3(2)
PLANT: Densely branched shrub, to 2 m tall; old bark dark gray, lenticular; branches gray, stiff and spinescent, puberulent to glabrate. LEAVES: 12-20 mm long, deciduous, odd-pinnately compound, 5-9 foliolate, with a winged rachis; leaflets sessile, elliptic, 6-9 mm long, 2-5 mm wide, entire, hirsute. INFLORESCENCE: small, dense spikes, terminal and axillary, 8-12 mm long; bracts ovate, pubescent, to 2 mm long; flowers appearing early before or with the first leaves. FLOWERS: to 3 mm long; sepals dark pink, glabrous; petals cream, glabrous. FRUIT: ovoid, 5-7 mm in diameter, dark red to orange, glandular hairy, wrinkled in dried specimens. NOTES: Gravelly mesas and rocky hillsides, often on limestone, in Chihuahuan Desert, semi-desert grassland, and oak (encinal) woodland, occasionally along dry washes and in mesquite bosques and riparian woodlands: Cochise, Graham, Greenlee, Pima, and Santa Cruz cos.; 1250-1715 m (3800-5200 ft); Mar-May; w TX and Mex to NM, AZ. In southeastern AZ, Rhus microphylla reaches the northwestern edge of its range. REFERENCES: John L. Anderson, 2006, Vascular Plants of Arizona: Anacardiaceae. CANOTIA 3 (2): 13-22.
Anderson 2007, Benson and Darrow 1981, Harris 1990, Kearney and Peebles 1960, Carter 2012
Common Name: littleleaf sumac Duration: Perennial Nativity: Native Lifeform: Tree General: Densely branched shrub to 2 m tall; dark gray bark when old; branches gray, stiff and spinescent, puberulent to glabrate. Leaves: Alternate, deciduous, odd-pinnately compound, 5-9 foliolate, with winged rachis; leaflets sessile, elliptic, entire, hirsute; 6-9 mm long, 2-5 mm wide. Flowers: In small, dense spikes, terminal and axillary, 8-12 mm long; ovate, pubescent bracts to 2 mm long; flowers appear before or with first leaves; to 3 mm long, 5 dark pink sepals, 5 cream petals, glabrous. Fruits: Ovoid berry 5-7 mm in diameter, dark red to orange and covered with glandular hairs. Ecology: Found on gravelly soils and on rocky slopes, on sandstone, limestone, and granitic parent material from 3,500-6,500 ft (1067-1981 m); flowers March-May. Distribution: s AZ, s NM, TX, s OK; south to c MEX. Notes: A frequent shrub in the Chihuahuan Desert distinguished as a densely-branched shrub with stiff, spinescent stems; pinnate leaves with 5-9 small leaflets (hence, microphylla) and the characteristic red berries of sumacs which are sour/lemon flavored; the stems and leaf rachises can often have a reddish tint. Ethnobotany: Fruits were eaten, made into jam and beverages. Etymology: Rhus is derived from rhous, an ancient Greek name for Sumac, while microphylla refers to the little leaves. Synonyms: None Editor: SBuckley 2010, FSCoburn 2015, AHazelton 2015
Rhus microphylla
Open Interactive Map
Rhus microphylla image
Patrick Alexander
Rhus microphylla image
Patrick Alexander
Rhus microphylla image
Patrick Alexander
Rhus microphylla image
Ries Lindley
Rhus microphylla image
Liz Makings
Rhus microphylla image
Liz Makings
Click to Display
7 Total Images
NSF NEON | Open Data to Understand our Ecosystems The National Ecological Observatory Network is a major facility fully funded by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.