• NSF NEON | Open Data to Understand our Ecosystems
  • Biorepository Data Portal

  • Home
  • Search
    • Sample search
    • Map search
    • Dynamic Species List
    • Taxonomic Explorer
  • Images
    • Image Browser
    • Image Search
  • Datasets
    • Research Datasets and Special Collections
    • Carabidae Checklists with Keys
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Invertebrates
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Plants
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Vertebrates
  • Sample Use
    • Sample Use Policy
    • Sample Request
    • Sample Archival Request
    • Data Usage Policy
    • Dataset Publishing
  • Additional Information
    • Tutorials and Help
    • Biorepository Staff
    • About NEON
    • NEON Data Portal
    • ASU Biocollections
    • About Symbiota
  • Getting Started
Login New Account Sitemap
Ranunculus aquatilis L.  

No occurrences found

Family: Ranunculaceae
white water crowfoot
[Ranunculus aquatilis var. hispidulus Drew, moreRanunculus aquatilis var. typicus L.D. Benson, Ranunculus trichophyllus var. hispidulus (E. Drew) W. Drew]
Ranunculus aquatilis image
Paul Rothrock
  • FNA
  • Field Guide
  • Resources
Alan T. Whittemore in Flora of North America (vol. 3)
Stems glabrous. Leaves laminate and filiform-dissected; laminate leaf blades reniform, 3-parted, 0.4-1.1 × 0.7-2.3 cm, segments obovate or fan-shaped, shallowly cleft, margins crenate; filiform-dissected leaves with stipules gradually tapering upward, connate for their whole length. Flowers: receptacle hispid, rarely glabrous; sepals spreading or reflexed, 2-4 × 1-2 mm, glabrous; petals 5, 4-7 × 1-5 mm; style 0.1-0.8 mm. Fruiting pedicels usually recurved. Heads of achenes hemispheric to ovoid, 2-4 × 2-5 mm; achenes 1-2 × 0.8-1.4 mm, glabrous or hispid; beak persistent, filiform, 0.1-1.2 mm. Ranunculus aquatilis is very variable. In the past it has often been treated as three or four species and many varieties. These segregate taxa have been based on the size, petiolation and rigidity of the leaves (now known to be primarily under environmental control), petal size and curvature of the fruiting pedicel (both sometimes variable along single stem), and number of achenes per head and length of achene beak (which vary continuously and are not correlated with one another). Unless reliable characters can be found, only two of the taxa recognized in older floras can be maintained.

Welsh et al. 1993, Kearney and Peebles 1980
Duration: Perennial Nativity: Native Lifeform: Forb/Herb General: Aquatic perennial with glabrous stem 1-2.5 mm wide, 20-80 cm long, submersed or floating and rooting at the nodes, stems 1-2.5 mm wide. Leaves: Alternate and cauline, submersed ones dissected into filiform segments, blades 1-3 cm long, on petioles 3-18 mm long, floating ones simple but deeply 3-parted and 1-2.5 cm broad by 1-1.5 cm long on petioles 1-3 cm long. Flowers: Solitary on pedicel 1-6 cm long, recurved at tip, 5 sepals, green or purplish, 3-5 mm long, glabrous, deciduous, 5 white petals, 1.5-2 mm long, subglobose fruiting head 4-6.5 mm high, 4-6 mm wide. Fruits: Achene transversely ridged, glabrous to somewhat hispid, especially dorsally, beaks absent or minute. Ecology: Found in ponds or streams from 4,500-9,000 (1372-2743 m); flowers May-July. Notes: Distinctive for its minute buttercup white flowers poking above the surface of the water. Ethnobotany: The entire plant was boiled and eaten. Etymology: Ranunculus is from Latin rana, for little frog, while aquatilis means growing in or near water. Synonyms: Batrachium aquatile, Ranunculus aquatilis var. hispidulus, R. aquatilis var. typicus, R. trichophyllus var. hispidulus Editor: SBuckley, 2010
Ranunculus aquatilis
Open Interactive Map
Ranunculus aquatilis image
Paul Rothrock
Ranunculus aquatilis image
Paul Rothrock
Ranunculus aquatilis image
Paul Rothrock
Ranunculus aquatilis image
Click to Display
5 Total Images
NSF NEON | Open Data to Understand our Ecosystems The National Ecological Observatory Network is a major facility fully funded by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.