• NSF NEON | Open Data to Understand our Ecosystems
  • Biorepository Data Portal

  • Home
  • Search
    • Sample search
    • Map search
    • Dynamic Species List
    • Taxonomic Explorer
  • Images
    • Image Browser
    • Image Search
  • Datasets
    • Research Datasets and Special Collections
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Invertebrates
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Plants
    • Checklist: Research Sites - Vertebrates
  • Sample Use
    • Sample Use Policy
    • Sample Request
    • Sample Archival Request
    • Data Usage Policy
  • Additional Information
    • Tutorials and Help
    • Biorepository Staff
    • About NEON
    • NEON Data Portal
    • ASU Biocollections
    • About Symbiota
  • Getting Started
Login New Account Sitemap
Echeandia texensis Cruden  

No occurrences found

Family: Asparagaceae
Texas craglily
Images
not available
  • FNA
  • Resources
Robert W. Cruden in Flora of North America (vol. 26)
Storage roots enlarged 2-6 cm from corms, 1-3 cm. Leaves: basal 4-9, 33-60 cm × 10-20 mm, blade linear to elliptic, margins denticulate; cauline 4-5, blade long-acuminate, the proximal (4.3-)10-20 cm, frequently exceeding next node. Inflorescence 1, 0-3(-12)-branched, 55-105 cm, glabrous. Flowers nodding; tepals broadly elliptic, 12-19 mm, outer 2-3 mm wide, inner 5-8 mm wide; filaments inserted in covered pits, narrowly clavate, 5-9 mm; anthers connate, forming cone 4-5.5 mm, cone weakly to strongly tapered, 2-3 mm wide, apex broadly and deeply lobed, 1-1.5 mm; ovary 2-3.5 mm. Capsules oblong, 9-13 × 4-6 mm. Flowering Apr, Jun, Nov. Clay dunes, llanos, open places; 0 m; Tex. Echeandia texensis is distinguished from E. reflexa, a common species of eastern Mexico, by the short, broad anther cone, which has a wide, broadly and deeply lobed apex. The anther cone of E. reflexa is longer and narrower, and the apex is narrower and minutely lobed.

Click to Display
0 Total Images
NSF NEON | Open Data to Understand our Ecosystems The National Ecological Observatory Network is a major facility fully funded by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.